What Project Management Methodology Should You ChooseGiven the myriad of proven project management techniques available, how do you know which methodology to choose? Maybe, you’ve used one type, such as Lean or Six Sigma, for the past five years, but you feel it’s missing something. Maybe, you’ve been improvising with your techniques, but it’s time to lean on something a little bit more structured. Or, perhaps, you’re new to project management, and you want to choose the method that is going to get you up and running in the simplest way possible.
Choosing The Right MethodologyNo matter what your objective may be, a project management methodology exists to fit every need, from the very simple to the most complex. In this guide, we’ll walk you through the 20 most popular methods. We’ll describe what they’re all about and highlight both the pros and cons of each approach. By the end of this article, you’ll have a clear idea of the methodologies that will suit your needs the best. When considering which project management methodology is right for your firm, keep the following factors in mind. Project Complexity What is the nature of your project? Is it a simple design or product on a shorter timeline involving a few stakeholders? Or is it more complex, with many phases, each requiring its unique details and tasks? Level Of Stakeholder Involvement How involved are your clients or corporate partners in the project management process? Does your project require their participation or approval throughout the various stages of your project implementation? The Nature Of The Project Some project management methodologies are geared towards specific industries, such as marketing agencies or software development. In this guide, we will be focusing on the most proven techniques that are well suited for project managers working in the creative sector, such as marketing and advertising.
Project Management Methodologies
1. WaterfallOne of the oldest, but most rigid project management methodologies is the Waterfall approach. Created for the manufacturing and construction industries, Waterfall is a top-down approach that requires one stage to complete its process before the next step in the project management can begin. Advantages
- Highly structured: The waterfall method is a highly structured approach that relies heavily on upfront planning before implementation takes place.
- Easy knowledge management: Because of this, it’s an excellent choice for firms that want to make sure all the project information is clearly written out so that if a key team member leaves, they don’t take essential knowledge needed to complete the project with them.
- Very rigid: The waterfall method is very rigid. You must complete each stage before moving on the next step.
- Planning heavy: It is also very planning- and documentation-heavy, which may bog smaller, more nimble firms down in unnecessary detail.
2. AgileBorn out of a movement away from documentation- and process-heavy management methodologies, Agile serves as a model that values collaboration and creativity over a rigid plan structure. Projects are broken into smaller sections called iterations. As one iteration is completed, it is reviewed by key stakeholders. The lessons learned from that iteration are incorporated into the next iteration. With each iteration, Agile project management focuses on four fundamental values. Those values are as follows: “Individuals and interactions over processes and tools” “Effective software over detailed documentation” “Customer Collaboration over contract negotiation” “Adapting to changes over sticking to a plan” Advantages
- Less focus on documentation: The benefits of the Agile system reside in its ability to deliver a product, usually software, quickly without the need for abundant documentation.
- Very flexible: Project managers can use this system to keep collaboration fluid through an ever-changing environment.
- Requires discipline: One of the most significant weaknesses of the Agile system is that it requires focus and discipline from all contributors.
- Communication is vital: Because it is not documentation-heavy, communication is the key to making sure the project moves along smoothly and on time.
3. ScrumScrum takes the Agile approach to project management and defines it in terms of sprints to accomplish the mission. Teams are formed around the one common objective, or sprint, whose completion of each sprint signifies one phase of the project. Before the initiation of a sprint, a review of stakeholder requirements will be reviewed, and and the product backlog may be updated accordingly. After evaluating and prioritizing your backlog based on the stakeholder requirement review, the subject of the next sprint will be assigned. Meetings are held throughout the sprint to track progress, and reviews are conducted after each sprint to analyze performance and ensure all items were completed effectively. Advantages
- Very flexible: Scrum is a highly flexible way to manage a project.
- Transparent: Quick daily standup scrum meetings are held to assess the progress of each sprint, and whether adaptations need to be made.
- Relies on a single person: Scrum relies heavily on the scrum master, a key leadership position, to ensure all team members are working proactively and with self-driven purpose.
- Requires collaboration and communication: This project management method requires a great deal of collaboration, communication, and proactiveness to be effective.
4. Critical Path Method (CPM)The critical path method tackles complex projects by breaking them up into smaller sequential tasks that must be finished before the next phase can launch. Each task is dependent upon the task prior to it. This form of project management is especially useful for teams that must rely on a certain production order before the final product can be realized, such as a creative team of a marketing firm. The duration of each task is estimated to create a formal timeline for the project. However, there is a distinction between critical and non-critical tasks. Non-critical tasks are not incorporated into the prioritization of tasks during the project. Instead, these tasks can be completed at any time. Advantage
- Predictive Approach: The critical path method allows a way to determine smaller increments of time allowed for each step along the path so that the overall deadline can arrive on time.
- Complicated: This method of project management is process heavy and complicated.
- Changing requirements requires huge adjustments: The amount of initial planning needed makes it least suitable for creative projects that are subject to changing customer requirements.
5. PRiSM(Image Source: GPM) PRiSM methodology looks at project management from a holistic point of view, taking into account all aspects of the business from an environmental, economic, socially ethical, and labor responsible aspect. Advantages
- Sustainable and value-based approach: For businesses concerned about corporate responsibility, the incorporation of socially considerate practices into the project management process allows project managers to recognize company values while effectively coordinating project flow.
- Whole company needs to act in concert: For a PRiSM approach to be effective, all aspects of the business must be invested in its success.
6. PRINCE2PRINCE2, or Projects IN Controlled Environments, originated within the UK government as an overarching methodology for project management across a variety of government agencies and some private sector companies. PRINCE2 consists of the following stages:
- Starting Up a Project
- Initiating a Project
- Directing a Project
- Controlling a Stage
- Managing Product Delivery
- Managing Resources and Boundaries
- Closing a Project
- Sets the agenda: Good PRINCE2 is an excellent choice for organizations that require heavy direction at the front end for projects that are void of surprises or changing requirements.
- Documentation- and process-heavy: PRINCE2 is documentation- and process-heavy, which means there is little room for customization, alteration, or creativity.
7. KanbanKanban is a production line inspired project management method. It works by placing task cards along one of four categories such as Idea Backlog, Prioritized, Pending, and Completed. This process allows for ultimate flexibility in project management and clear visibility into the status of any given task. Advantages
- Great Transparency: With the Kanban method, cards can contain as much detail about the task as you need it to, including who is responsible for each task.
- Visible Progress: With a glance, you can see how the progress of all tasks is coming at any given time.
- Not timeline-based: This method is not timeline based. Instead, it focuses more on efficiently distributing work so that progress stays fluid and does not become bogged down by unrealistic workloads or expectations.
8. ScrumbanScrumban, a cross between Scrum and Kanban keeps ultimate flexibility in mind for fast-paced projects. Married with this idea of ultimate flexibility is an established day to day structure, so any given project stays focused and on course. Tasks are clearly defined and organized, and WIP (work in progress) meetings are held daily to keep the team on track. Advantage
- Lean and flexible: Scrumban takes the fast paced nature of Scrum and marries it with the task-driven nature of Kanban boards, making it ideally suited for any creative team that needs to stay lean while adapting to changes on a daily basis.
- No focus on documentation: Scrumban is not the best choice for any organization that must include heavy documentation and regulation into its project management processes. Other, more detailed and robust methodologies would be better suited for this kind of requirement.
9. Project Management Institute’s PMBOKPMBOK, or Project Management Body Of Knowledge, refer to the guide that lays out all that is believed to be best practice in project management. It is heavily processed based, and attempts to define every step of the project management process so that no stone is left unturned when planning and initiating product production. Advantages
- Very comprehensive: PMBOK takes all aspects of the business into consideration as far as they interact with the actual project process. So financial forecasting, human resources, and strategic management all have their places in PMBOK.
- Suited for large projects: Because of the comprehensive nature of PMBOK, it can successfully lead a project manager down a course of success regarding detail heavy, large scale projects.
- Not suited for small projects: PMBOK is so comprehensive in nature, it’s not a great choice for smaller project teams focused on specific projects that don’t have much reach into other aspects of the company.
10. Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM)Critical Chain Project Management, or CCPM, is built upon the idea that rarely will anything ever go as planned. Some tasks may finish early, while other tasks will take twice as long as expected to complete. Therefore, when projecting the timeline for a project based on its due date, the CCPM method inserts buffers to compensate for, or level out, this discrepancy between forecast and reality. Advantages
- Minimizing wasted resources: CCPM reduces waste by optimizing human resources, physical resources and time by inserting a buffer into each process.
- Relatively rigid: CCPM can often be too rigid for many project managers overseeing processes that are more dynamic.
- Not suited for changing scope: Products that experience a good deal of changing requirements while in the production phase are not good candidates for CCPM methods.
11. Lean(Source:YouTube) Lean project management is a method focused on reducing waste by implementing key focus areas into the process cycle. Lean identifies value by eliminating all areas where waste occurs, mainly due to overtasking, inefficient multitasking, and unrealistic timelines. Although a project management method in its own right, Lean serves as a philosophical umbrella for a variety of similar project management methodologies such as Kanban and Last Planner System. Lean project management is practiced by implementing the following five pillars: 1) Specify the value in the eyes of the customer Understand the objectives through the customer’s eyes. Having a clear understanding ensures you aren’t wasting resources producing something your customer does not want. 2) Identify the value stream and eliminate waste Value stream consists of all actions that are necessary to bring the product to life. Any other step is a waste of time and should be eliminated. 3) Make value flow at the pull of the customer In a nutshell, these means do not overburden your teams with unnecessary projects. Only allocate tasks to teams that can handle them, and ones that the customer has requested. 4) Involve and empower employees Your team members should be highly involved in the process. After all, they are the experts. 5) Continuously improve in the pursuit of perfection Review your work after each project. Identify waste and adapt to become more efficient for the next project. Advantage
- Waste is minimized: By focusing on areas where waste is apparent, true productive flow is achieved, which makes the process of project management easier.
- Not suited for rigid management structures: Those who are used to a more rigid management structure will find this method difficult to adapt to.
12. Six SigmaSix Sigma project management is based on production environments that use Six Sigma processes. Six Sigma aims to optimize efficiency and create the exact product customers want by adhering to five core principles: Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control. This project management process heavily relies on data collection and analysis. Advantage
- Optimizing efficiency: Six Sigma is a process that’s been around for decades. So, it has proven its worth time and time again as a way to cut down waste while optimizing efficiency.
- Resource-intensive: Six Sigma is data analysis heavy. So lightweight processes with quick turnaround are not always ideal candidates for Six Sigma implementation.
13. New Product Introduction (NPI)New Product Introduction, or NPI, refers to the process of planning, developing, producing, and introducing a new product, service, or technology. It is often referred to as NPD or New Product Development. NPI is a process that entails contributions from all aspects of an organization for the cycle of new product planning, production, and implementation to meet success. It relies on six stages or gates: Define, Feasibility, Develop, Validate, Implement, and Evaluate. Each gate is dependent upon the next. Advantages
- Reducing development cost: New product development and introduction can be risky and costly given today’s competitive market. NPI works to reduce development cost by inserting the voice of the customer (VOC) early in the project planning stages.
- Faster time to market: It also results in faster time to market so that revenue can be realized in less time. With its incorporated Design For Manufacturing and Assembly best practices, the manufacturing processes are made more efficient, and quality processes are improved considerably.
- Not suited for simple projects: For simple product design or improved versions of existing designs, NPI is not an efficient model.
14. Package Enabled Reengineering (PER)In the software industry, package-enabled design project management focuses on a software package original functionality as the framework to rethink the design. It relies on challenging current practices to identify new systems for processing. Package enabled design requires analysis of current processes, design, structure, and management and aims to replace inefficiencies wherever identified. Advantage
- Optimize Existing Processes: Package Enable Design provides a framework for reengineering current processes and reconfiguring products into a new design.
- Focused on inefficient processes: This process is best used in project management that needs to rethink current processes. It is not best for business environments that are already operating efficiently.
15. Outcome Mapping(Source:https://artd.com.au) Outcome mapping, or OM, is a project management approach aimed at improving processes within international development, research communication, research projects, and policy development. It is based on the concept of measuring and analyzing outcomes, otherwise known as behavioral changes. By using OM, stakeholders can continually project possible outcomes and make decisions based on the probability of those outcomes. OM can be used as a standalone methodology, or in conjunction with other methods such as Most Significant Change (MSC) or Logframe analysis. Advantage
- Keeping track of project’s progress: Great for real-time analysis of project progress, OM can keep your research or policy project on task and focused.
- Not suited for product production: This is not a realistic project management philosophy for product production.
16. Adaptive(Source:Slideshare) Adaptive project management, also known as adaptive project framework, allows you as the project manager to propose a course of action, measure its success with each iteration of phases, use that information to redefine process methods, and then reassess to see if you’re on the right track. Formally it consists of the following stages: planning, execution, monitoring, control, and evaluation. Adaptive project management can be executed passively or actively. In passive situations, the project manager applies lessons learned in one iteration to the following iteration. In active situations, the project manager determines a flexible project strategy base to experiment with. The project is broken into iterations. As one iteration is executed based on the current strategy, the outcome is assessed, and the next iteration is adjusted accordingly. Advantage
- Very flexible: Adaptive Project Management gives managers the freedom to define an approach and change it as needed.
- Not suited for rigid structures: For highly regulated processes, the ability to change approaches mid-cycle may be difficult.
17. CrystalThe Crystal method of project management that focuses on the collaborative environment and the people involved in it over the tools and processes involved. The more freely individuals communicate, the more they will self regulate and work collaboratively, abandoning the need for a formal, process-based management approach entirely. The most productive environment is one where that stimulates people into action and interaction, focusing on the needs of the client and how well their products in each stage matches client needs. Within The Crystal Method, there are four approaches based on team size:
- Clear Crystal is for teams 8 or less
- Yellow Crystal is for teams of 10 to 20 members
- Orange Crystal is for 20 to 50 people teams
- Red Crystal is for teams of 50 to 100 people
- Listening to customers: The Crystal method allows members to focus on building a quality product by listening closest to customer needs and working together in a close, collaborative environment.
- Very different to traditional approaches: It may be a project management system that’s difficult for managers to adapt to if they’ve had a long history employing more traditional methodologies.
18. Joint Application DevelopmentJoint Application Development (JAD) is a project management methodology that was originally designed for software development. It can be applied to most any project, however. JAD focuses on a workshop-style approach to project management where team members come together in a structured, focused way using a facilitator, mediators, team members, and project related experts. With this tight-knit collaborative environment approach to project management, errors are reduced, and product quality improves. Advantages
- Increasing productivity: JAD is an effective approach for increasing productivity through tight-knit collaboration.
- Less focus on processes: It’s focused heavily on team collaboration and less on formal processes. For more traditional business structure, this management system may not be the best approach.
19. HybridHybrid project management combines two primary methodologies: fast-paced, highly flexible Agile management, and traditional process heavy waterfall management. The reason Hybrid combines both methods lies in the fact that many projects span a variety of disciplines. One discipline such as mechanical production may do better with a Waterfall approach. While other disciplines, such as software production, excels with an Agile approach. Hybrid project management uses the model of sprints but applies more stringent process parameters wherever needed, similar to the Waterfall approach. Advantages
- Very flexible: Hybrid project management works well with a majority of broadly based projects.
- Quite complicated: This approach may be unnecessarily complicated for smaller, one-dimensional projects.
20. Integrated Project Management (IPM)Integrated project management is a process that approaches the project from start to finish from a variety of standpoints so that a comprehensive plan is formed. The methodology is based on six fundamentals: project charter, project scope, project management plan, project execution, project monitoring, change control. You can use an online roadmap maker to lay out this process visually and share it with your team. Advantages
- Increasing efficiency: Integrated project management is an effective way to collect information about processes and functions, integrate it into existing corporate knowledge, and share it with other stakeholders.
- Very comprehensive: Integrated project management is not the best choice for smaller projects that require leanness to adapt to changing requirements.
ConclusionNow that you have had the chance to get acquainted with a large variety of project management methodologies, you may have noticed a trend among them all. They fall into one of two categories: lightweight and adaptable or comprehensive and process-driven. When deciding which project management method to use the first big decision will be decided based on the needs of your project. Does the process need to be flexible to respond to changing customer needs, or does it need to be detailed to keep up with the demand of a multi-dimensional project? From there, choose the method that you feel is the best fit for you, your team, and most importantly, your product.
Max is a SaaS enthusiast and loves actionable content that provides direct value.